Skip to content

Fix BC_SlIP_WALL casing typo#1228

Closed
sbryngelson wants to merge 1 commit into
MFlowCode:masterfrom
sbryngelson:fix/slip-wall-typo
Closed

Fix BC_SlIP_WALL casing typo#1228
sbryngelson wants to merge 1 commit into
MFlowCode:masterfrom
sbryngelson:fix/slip-wall-typo

Conversation

@sbryngelson

@sbryngelson sbryngelson commented Feb 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

User description

Summary

  • Fixed BC_SlIP_WALL (lowercase L) to BC_SLIP_WALL in the z-direction boundary condition handler
  • The typo caused the case statement to not match the BC_SLIP_WALL constant, making the slip wall condition unreachable for this boundary direction

Test plan

  • Verify 3D slip wall boundary conditions work correctly
  • No golden file changes expected (fixes dead code path)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code


CodeAnt-AI Description

Restore slip-wall boundary condition handling for the Z-direction in 3D runs

What Changed

  • Fixed a casing typo so the slip-wall boundary case now matches and executes for the z-direction
  • Slip-wall boundary behavior in 3D is now applied where intended instead of being skipped
  • No behavioral changes to other boundary types; existing boundary handlers remain unchanged

Impact

✅ Correct 3D slip-wall boundaries
✅ Fewer incorrect boundary treatments in z-direction
✅ More accurate simulation results when slip walls are used

💡 Usage Guide

Checking Your Pull Request

Every time you make a pull request, our system automatically looks through it. We check for security issues, mistakes in how you're setting up your infrastructure, and common code problems. We do this to make sure your changes are solid and won't cause any trouble later.

Talking to CodeAnt AI

Got a question or need a hand with something in your pull request? You can easily get in touch with CodeAnt AI right here. Just type the following in a comment on your pull request, and replace "Your question here" with whatever you want to ask:

@codeant-ai ask: Your question here

This lets you have a chat with CodeAnt AI about your pull request, making it easier to understand and improve your code.

Example

@codeant-ai ask: Can you suggest a safer alternative to storing this secret?

Preserve Org Learnings with CodeAnt

You can record team preferences so CodeAnt AI applies them in future reviews. Reply directly to the specific CodeAnt AI suggestion (in the same thread) and replace "Your feedback here" with your input:

@codeant-ai: Your feedback here

This helps CodeAnt AI learn and adapt to your team's coding style and standards.

Example

@codeant-ai: Do not flag unused imports.

Retrigger review

Ask CodeAnt AI to review the PR again, by typing:

@codeant-ai: review

Check Your Repository Health

To analyze the health of your code repository, visit our dashboard at https://app.codeant.ai. This tool helps you identify potential issues and areas for improvement in your codebase, ensuring your repository maintains high standards of code health.

The case statement used BC_SlIP_WALL (lowercase l) instead of
BC_SLIP_WALL, which would fail to match the constant defined in
m_constants.fpp, making the slip wall boundary condition unreachable
for this specific 3D boundary direction.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 21, 2026 22:57
@codeant-ai

This comment has been minimized.

@coderabbitai

This comment has been minimized.

@codeant-ai codeant-ai Bot added the size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files label Feb 21, 2026
@codeant-ai

This comment has been minimized.

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues found across 1 file

Confidence score: 5/5

  • Automated review surfaced no issues in the provided summaries.
  • No files require special attention.

@codeant-ai

This comment has been minimized.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Fixes an unreachable slip-wall boundary condition branch in the z-direction boundary-condition handler by correcting a constant name typo, ensuring BC_SLIP_WALL is properly matched in the relevant select case.

Changes:

  • Corrected case (BC_SlIP_WALL) to case (BC_SLIP_WALL) in the z-direction boundary condition dispatch.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Feb 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 44.05%. Comparing base (d048c4b) to head (1216c4d).
⚠️ Report is 15 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1228      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   44.07%   44.05%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          70       70              
  Lines       20431    20498      +67     
  Branches     1974     1990      +16     
==========================================
+ Hits         9004     9030      +26     
- Misses      10291    10329      +38     
- Partials     1136     1139       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@sbryngelson sbryngelson deleted the fix/slip-wall-typo branch February 22, 2026 21:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants